HOW we read is maybe more important, even, than WHAT we read: The importance of "deep reading"
![]() |
| My 'to be read' pile -- honest to goodness old-fashioned books, plus my Kindle (limited connection to the internet) |
I start my day with words.
Well. With word games. On my phone.
Wordle then Spelling Bee then Connections then Strands. All via the New York Times, in which I might scan the headlines and might sometimes read the full stories. But the word games are a daily ritual — a brain warm-up for the day ahead. I move through each puzzle at my own pace, sometimes jumping between them if I get stuck, and often listening to early-morning radio in the background.
Sometimes, the words coming at me over the airwaves capture my attention and then my imagination and then I am diverted down a thinking road sparked by more words, other words, words that paint a picture of... something out there in the larger world. And then I might get bored with that spoken-word-painted story and I return to the word game on the small screen of my phone.
Throughout the day, I read many words on a variety of screens — my phone, my laptop, an old iPad — but I rarely read a physical book. That I leave for the late evening, once in bed.
I love that time between getting into bed and turning out the light. The words I read on those pages at that time seem different to me, take me deeper into a longer story and are my end-of-day ritual — a transition from screen-time daytime to page-bound nighttime.
I am a different reader of words in different media. The same person, but a different reader.
Screen-reader me dashes along the lines, skips over words, tries to get to the end, the meaning without taking the time to read every single word. Get to the point, I scream in my head. Just take me to the end of what you are saying and wanting me to know. I don’t have time for all your words!
But page-reader me embodies a slower long-ago time when screens were not yet present and time unfolded page by page as stories took shape across several hundred pages and many thousands of words. And remembering, I sink back into that time and go deep into the story on the page in my hands.
Reading — deep reading — is more important now than it has ever been. And I learned recently that my differentiation between screen reading and book reading is not just a quirk, it is science, because studies show that the medium in or on which we read words influences how we relate to it:
- Scrolling on our screens across words and images and clicking live links creates what has been dubbed the “juggler’s brain” — rapid movement across the surface of our thinking capacity.
- Holding a book and sustaining our attention across the pages of a longer argument (story) helps to build an architecture within the wiring of the mind that is robust enough for imagination and reasoning, for abstraction and debate to take root.
- When that architecture is not built, we are at risk of being serf to the new feudal lords “who control the symbols — platforms, algorithms, influencers — [and who] shape belief, while the rest of us scroll through the pictures.”
Awareness of a problem or an issue is the first step towards addressing it effectively: I know that I am a different reader online than on the page. I know that it is on the page that I ‘deep read’. I know that ‘deep reading’ encourages critical thinking. So. To shore up my mind’s architecture for reasoning, debate and critical thinking, I know, unequivocally, that I must withstand the easy reward of online words and must read more on the page.
Our world is full of problems and issues. Our world needs our critical thought more than ever. We know that change always begins with ourselves. Reading an old-fashioned book seems a pretty easy way to contribute, even a tiny bit, to an improved state for our ourselves and our neighbours, no?
............................................................................................................................................
To receive my weekly blogpost in your inbox, use the SUBSCRIBE feature (above, in the left-hand column), or email fiveyearsawriter at gmail dot com. Put SUBSCRIBE in the subject line.
Land acknowledgement: I respectfully recognize that I live on the original lands of Anishinaabe, Cree, Oji-Cree, Dakota and Dene peoples, and on the homeland of the Métis Nation.

I actually have friends who don’t read. They CAN but don’t. This is unimaginable to me. I read almost exclusivity on my Kindle, buy all my books, share my virtual library with my family. Of course it’s connected to the internet. How else could I download a new book when I finish the last? Or look up a word. Or translate a phrase from Klingon into English?
ReplyDeleteAt least three hours of every day is spent reading, those special hours from eight pm to eleven.
And I’ve been doing this for 80+ years
Ann - you are quite right, of course; my Kindle is connected, too, for the functions you mention. But that connection isn't used for surfing the net and dashing here and there with my juggler's brain to interrupt my reading.
DeleteInteresting perspective re: hard cover versus electronic. But my Kindle never loses its page, it works with the light off (which is handy when I wake up in the middle of the night and don't want to wake my wife), it holds about a thousand books, looks up definitions for me, and it weighs nothing (woosie me!). But I occasionally read a hard cover, mostly because my daughter (the incorrigible librarian) keeps buying them for me!
ReplyDeleteI appreciate my Kindle for those same reasons, Steve. Especially its capacity to hold so many books and to keep my place in every one of them. But I do notice a different relationship between me and the words and the story when I hold an old-fashioned book. It's kind of fascinating to me...
DeleteI'm with you, Amanda. While I can (and do, because of all the composing I do on my PC) flit about amongst electronic pages, windows, files, etc., I prefer that my deep reading be with hard copy. I love dog-earing, underlining, printing notes in the margins, creating my own organizational framework, using sticky notes to mark especially meaningful passages, etc.
ReplyDeleteIf I were to read novels voraciously, I would likely be using Kindle, too. But I rarely (like maybe twice a year) read a novel.
I needed to see this, I wasn't aware of the difference but it makes sense. Thank you.
ReplyDeleteI agree wholeheartedly Amanda. Thank you for forwarding Rick Lash's article. I start my day with word puzzles too. And end with a book in bed - sometimes it is on my kindle though. I love the feel of a real book and gravitate to them. My house is so packed with books, that I've read and want to reread. Too many for a lifetime. I've been ordering on kindle to slow the rate of increase of my darlings. But if I read something on kindle that I love, I find a hard copy somewhere to keep on the shelf. Redundant I know but that's me. I see you read short stories too. That is my preferred genre at bedtime. Thanks so much for your insightful essay.
ReplyDeleteWhen 'screen reading' hit the scene, I was not impressed as to how this new creation of the internet (that not it isn't fabulous in the correct ways meant too) would be a solution to life very quickly, rush it folks!...here it is! I hold the page as the go-to, the gravity to learning, processing and imagination. And you hit a good point that these two (screen and page) do lend to different types of reading. What a great article Amanda...Thank you.
ReplyDeleteI printed this out and read it! Kidding! But if I had, I would have paid more attention. Spot on article.
ReplyDelete